The vertical axis shows the annualized default rate for the three month period ending in August, for each of the nine Bay Area counties. The horizontal axis shows the percentage change in price through May, measured relative to the three-year period from July 2005 to June 2008 (i.e., the bubble years).Note: I reversed the horizontal axis to make the chart easier to read. Ideally, it would show the percentage of homes that are underwater. I don’t have detailed data on underwater homes, however, so I used the change in price relative to the bubble years as a proxy for the percentage of homes that are underwater. You can read more about this proxy for underwater homes here and here.
The relationship between the two variables is clearly strong, and supports the idea that underwater homeowners are making cold-blooded decisions to default, simply because they believe it’s in their interest to do so.
On the other side of the coin, there seems to be a widespread belief that heavy foreclosure activity depresses sale prices. If that’s true, then falling prices can lead to a self-reinforcing “doom loop” where underwater homeowners walk away from their homes, which then hit the market as foreclosures and depress prices even further.
Perhaps that story holds true in other markets, but there isn’t much support for it here in the Bay Area. Take a look at the chart, below, which compares recent price changes to REO sale activity for the nine Bay Area counties.
The vertical axis shows the change in median price over the last twelve months. The horizontal axis shows the number of bank-owned homes (REO’s) that have been sold during the same period.REO’s accounted for more than 30% of all sales in five of the nine Bay Area counties. All but one of these counties outperformed San Francisco, where REO’s accounted for only 15% of sales. I wouldn’t call this an ironclad case but I don’t think Bay Area homeowners need to worry about foreclosures depressing property values.
No comments:
Post a Comment